🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, coercive phone calls persisted. Initially, supposedly from a former police officer and a former defense officer, later from the authorities. Finally, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh claims he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is among those opposing a multimillion-dollar initiative where Dharavi – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – is scheduled to be bulldozed and modernized by a multinational conglomerate.

"The culture of Dharavi is exceptional in the planet," explains the resident. "Yet the plan aims to dismantle our social fabric and silence our voices."

Contrasting Realities

The cramped lanes of Dharavi present a dramatic difference to the towering buildings and Bollywood penthouses that loom over the area. Dwellings are built haphazardly and often without proper sanitation, unregulated industries release harmful emissions and the air is permeated by the suffocating smell of open sewers.

For certain residents, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a glistening neighborhood of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, shiny shopping centers and homes with two toilets is an aspirational dream realized.

"We lack proper healthcare, roads or drainage and there are no spaces for youth to recreate," says a chai seller, fifty-six, who relocated from southern India in the early eighties. "The only way is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

However, some, including this protester, are fighting against the plan.

Everyone acknowledges that the slum, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring financial support and improvement. Yet they are concerned that this plan – lacking resident participation – might turn valuable urban land into a luxury development, displacing the lower-caste, immigrant populations who have been there since the nineteenth century.

It was these marginalized, displaced people who established the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and economic productivity, whose output is estimated at between one million dollars and a substantial sum annually, making it among the globe's biggest informal economies.

Relocation Worries

Among approximately one million residents living in the crowded 220-hectare area, less than 50% will be eligible for replacement housing in the development, which is estimated to take seven years to accomplish. Others will be moved to wastelands and saline fields on the far outskirts of Mumbai, risking break up a generations-old social network. Some will not get housing at all.

Residents permitted to remain in Dharavi will be allocated apartments in tower blocks, a major break from the evolved, shared lifestyle of dwelling and laboring that has maintained the community for so long.

Industries from tailoring to ceramic crafts and material recovery are expected to decrease in quantity and be moved to a designated "business area" far from residential areas.

Existential Threat

In the case of Shaikh, a workshop owner and third generation inhabitant to call home Dharavi, the plan presents a survival challenge. His rickety, three-floor operation produces apparel – tailored coats, luxury coats, decorated jackets – distributed in premium stores in south Mumbai and abroad.

His family resides in the spaces below and laborers and garment workers – workers from north India – also sleep there, permitting him to afford their labour. Beyond the slum, housing costs are often significantly more expensive for a single room.

Threats and Warning

Within the government offices close by, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative depicts a very different vision for the future. Fashionable residents move around on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, purchasing continental bread and breakfast items and socializing on a terrace adjacent to Dharavi Cafe and Ice-Cream. It is a world away from the inexpensive idli sambar morning meal and low-cost tea that sustains local residents.

"This isn't development for our community," says the protester. "This constitutes a massive real estate deal that will make it unaffordable for residents to remain."

Furthermore, there's distrust of the corporate group. Run by a prominent businessman – among the country's wealthiest and a close ally of the national leader – the business group has faced accusations of favoritism and ethical concerns, which it denies.

Even as administrative bodies describes it as a partnership, the business group contributed $950m for its controlling interest. A case stating that the initiative was improperly granted to the corporation is under review in the nation's highest judicial body.

Ongoing Pressure

Since they began to publicly resist the redevelopment, local opponents state they have been experienced a long-running campaign of harassment and intimidation – including messages, clear intimidation and implications that speaking against the initiative was comparable with anti-national sentiment – by individuals they allege represent the corporate group.

Among those alleged to have making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c