🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are paid to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A effort to erase Black history and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.